2013년 12월 31일 화요일

Thoughts on Thanksgiving .... after a Typhoon.


Thoughts on Thanksgiving .... after a Typhoon.


Today is Thanksgiving. This is a holiday I did not grow up with in N.Ireland but one that I have come to love over the years. Special memories of wonderful food and family gathered together with the purpose of fellowship and to give thanks to our Heavenly Father. This year we had an early Thanksgiving with Danny's family before we left for the Philippines and it was a beautiful day of encouragement to one another and praises to God. It was so easy to give thanks that day. I remember well, that it was just the day before our meal when we had re-confirmed (after having to repeat her tests) that Izzy was ok to travel to the Philippines. Then the typhoon had hit the Philippines the night before our family get together, but an hour before our meal I received word that our friends in the village and our co workers on Palawan were all safe and well. We were so relieved and we praised the Lord. One by one, from the oldest all the way to the youngest, our family gave testimony to the goodness of God, and rightly so, we have much to be thankful for in these days.

We returned to the Philippines a few days after the typhoon but instead of going straight home to the village, we were asked to stay here in town for a few weeks, to help with the relief supplies which are being flown by our N.T.M.A. pilots to some remote islands off the coast of Palawan. The typhoon brought much destruction, loss of lives, loss of homes, families separated, towns and islands left bare. Day after day I have read stories in the news, names and faces have been put with the numbers and the stories are heartbreaking. Daily, as the pilots have returned from the islands they have also shared of the sights they find, houses gone, boats wrecked, no food and people surviving on seaweed until help was sent. I have looked, via photographs, into the beautiful faces of wide-eyed children who have seen sights we would wish no child should ever see. The country mourns.

So as Thanksgiving Day approached on the calendar, I was uneasy. To be honest I wasn't sure at first why I couldn't shake the feeling in the pit of my stomach. But it was this;I was feeling guilty for all that we could enjoy when there are those in this country (and all around the world who have nothing). How do we deal with that? Is it just enough to be thankful for what we have or is there more that we are to do?

This morning at 7.30am, Thanksgiving morning, my friend Candy texted me a verse, she had thought of me when she read it that morning, it was Habakkuk 3:19.

"The Lord God is my strength, and He will make my feet like hinds' feet, and He will make me to walk upon my high places."

It was encouraging but I wondered what had led up to this particular verse. When was the last time I read the book of Habukkuk? I had a look.

It was in these verses that the Lord challenged my heart:

17Although the fig tree shall not blossom, neither shall fruit be in the vines; the labour of the olive shall fail, and the fields shall yield no meat; the flock shall be cut off from the fold, and there shall be no herd in the stalls:18Yet I will rejoice in theLord, I will joy in the God of my salvation.

Even though all lies empty and barren, we can still rejoice whether we have or we have not; because it is not about the things that this world holds but instead it is all about Who holds this world in His Hands. The Lord of my salvation. Not the Lord of the crops (though He is) not the Lord of my health (though He is) not the Lord of my wealth (though He is) but the Lord of my Salvation!

Salvation is the gift that changed my life for all eternity. It is from this place at the foot of the cross that I can give thanks in all situations. At the foot of the cross victory was accomplished and death holds ground no more. It is while bowed in His presence that I am ushered into this safe and holy place where I know, no matter what this life holds for me; Jesus loves me. My Saviour died for me on a cruel cross. He who was pure, bore my sin, so I may go free. There is Life after death because Jesus arose and He reigns on high forevermore. When Jesus died and I placed my faith in Him, He took my guilt and shame. Today I can live guilt free and grateful, not for the gifts alone, but grateful to the Giver of all that is Life.

Thinking on this reminded me of the day we had to unexpectedly repeat Izzy's tests at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, it was just days before our planned departure to the Philippines. On the way home in the car her Daddy was talking to her trying to explain the reasons why we had to go back to the hospital when a week before we had told her we were finished with doctor visits for a while. I listened as Danny tenderly went on to explain that Jesus always loves us, even when things happen to us that we don't like and He will always be with us through those times. She hadn't said anything and I was beginning to wonder what she was thinking about this whole conversation. It was then that our confident little three year old piped up from the back seat, (with a slight tone of exasperation at the over explaining) and she said this; "Papa, I know that Jesus loves me, because He died for me."

Silence from the grown ups who had been doing all the explaining.

We can make it so complicated and over think things that are outside of our control. How could we ever look at anything in life and doubt that He loves us when He has shown us the greatest act of Love this world has ever known. The Creator, became the sacrifice for those whom He created. God's only Son, died for me, and He died for you. Amazing. A place of Thanksgiving everyday when we ponder this miracle of Love.

So today, I know I have many things to list off that I can be thankful for but there is none greater or more precious than the gift of salvation. And, as my heart breaks for the people who have lost much in this country it also reminds me so clearly that people (no matter their station in life) need the Lord. They need to hear the news of Salvation. I am so blessed to have a small part in being here to help with the relief goods that are going out to the islands near us, but I pray for a bigger vision beyond a bottle of water or a bag of rice. Food for the body is not enough there must be also be food for the soul. I pray that these weeks of loving and giving to these needy people will open the floodgates for the message of the Cross. Though they suffer now and have nothing that this world holds dear, may this be a path that leads them to the Greatest Gift of all; the Saviour of this earth. The precious One, who is the Living Water and Bread of Life, to a lost and needy world.

And so, from a state of thankfulness to my Saviour, I know what I personally must continue to do; and that is; to make His Name known. "If the gospel is hid, it is hid to those who are lost". There is no greater gift that we can share with another human being, than when we share the message of the gospel, with our lives. Standing together in this messy, hurt, fallen, upside down world and letting the Holy Spirit use our simple words, our small deeds to show forth His message of Grace and Mercy. Some days that involves loading bags of rice on to a helicopter, some days it is struggling through a difficult language so we can teach Word of God, some days it is being silent in the midst of accusation, some days it is just doing whatever we do and doing it all over again, and well . And then, there are acts and occasions that are no less extraordinary, times of sitting on the floor listening to our children, inviting a neighbor over for a meal, calling a family member on the phone, talking to the lady in line in front of us at the grocery store. Ambassadors for Christ living out our lives for His great Name's sake. This is where Thanksgiving brings me to today, and I am grateful.

Thank you to all who have donated to the victims of Typhoon and thank you to all who have prayed for the dear people of the Philippines. This week Danny and I will be finishing up our time here in town, though the relief efforts will continue here for some time. As others come to help in the process we will now make our way home to the village. Home to a group of believers whose fellowship we have greatly missed and home to our house on the hill where our little family is very blessed to dwell.

"Lord, as we give thanks today, may our vision be renewed for more of You, and may Salvation be the Gift that we rejoice in this day and everyday, until one day we are Home at last with You."


Grateful for the Cross,
Philippa.



Our early Thanksgiving just a few days before we returned to the Philippines. :)


Thanksgiving leads to living. Sending relief foods to those who are in need.

Snappy Answers to Banned Questions


Snappy Answers to Banned Questions


So, Christian Piatt has a new book coming out (apparently it's now available for pre-order) called Banned Questions About Christians. If you follow that last link, you can see a list of the fifty questions that the book thoughtfully, patiently, and faithfully addresses.

Unfortunately, I'm nowhere near so thoughtful, patient, or faithful. So I'm only going to look at the first fifteen questions, and my answers (in italics) aren't going to be anywhere near as helpful.
1. Can you be LGBTQ and be a Christian? Yes. A minister? In some denominations. More denominations and Christian communities are welcoming LGBTQ people, as well as ordaining LGBTQ as ministers. Is this really possible? Absolutely.

2. Preachers such as Joel Osteen preach about Jesus wanting us to be rich. Where does this belief come from? Wishful thinking. Wasnt Jesus poor? Yes. Didnt he tell rich people to give everything away? Emphatically.

3. Where did all of the pictures of the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Jesus come from? Psychological projection. Do Christians really think Jesus was white? Not if they've given the matter even a moment's thought.

4. Why do some Christians not seem to believe in science? They've been told they can't. Can a scientist be a Christian? Yes. Have there been famous scientists that were Christians? Many.

5. In too many instances, the most gracious, gentle, peaceful, thoughtful, patient, kind, generous, and steadfast people in my life have been non-Christians. Does it really take being a Christian to be Christlike? Dunno about that. It certainly doesn't take being Christian to be moral, caring, or decent.

6. Is Christianity really just about fire insurance? For some people. Are we just trying to make sure we dont go to hell when we die? Not all Christians, no. And if personal salvation is a once-and-for-all event, why bother taking part in church after that? Coffee and donuts? (Actually... and I realize this may come as a shock, but... some people genuinely enjoy it.)

7. Some Christians believe the Bible is without error and the only real authority for living, but they ignore parts of the Old and New Testament. Why hold on to six verses on homosexuality but ignore books and chapters about slavery? People focus on what's important to them.

8. Are Mormons, Jehovahs Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Spiritists, Christian Scientists, etc., really Christians? Who cares? Who gets to decide? Whoever has the power to enforce their opinions.

9. Do Christians have to be baptized? Yes. Absolutely. Unless they don't. Why do some sprinkle while others immerse? Because given the opportunity, people will disagree about anything. Which one is “right”? When you let yourself get sucked into arguing over trivial minutiae, everyone is wrong.

10. It seems like theres a lot of conflict between Christians and Jews. Wasnt Jesus Jewish? Yes. Arent Christians technically Jewish too? You know who really ought to answer that? Jews. Ask them. Yes, seriously.

11. If all Christians basically believe the same thing, why do they have so many different denominations? Because given the opportunity, people will disagree about anything. And if there are so many denominations struggling to survive, why dont they just combine with other ones? Because these things are important, dammit. (Old joke: You know why office politics are so petty? Because the stakes are so small.)

12. Can someone be both an atheist and a Christian? No. Not without stretching the definition of "Christian" to the point of absurdity. If “Christian” actually means “follower of Christ,” could someone be a student of the life of Jesus without accepting the claims of his divinity, or claims of the existence of any divinity at all? If you take away the divinity and the miracles, there isn't much "life of Jesus" to be a student of... and what's left isn't all that unique.

13. Why do so many churches do communion in different ways and on such different schedules? Because people will disagree over anything. I may be repeating myself on this point. Who is allowed to serve communion? It varies. And do all Christians believe the bread and wine/juice actually become the body and blood of Jesus? No. Why? Because, say it with me, people will disagree about anything.

14. What do Christians believe about disaster and suffering in the world? It varies. If God has a plan, why is suffering part of it? A. It's because of The Fall. B. The people who are suffering are clearly being punished for their transgressions. C. The people being punished are being taught a Meaningful Life Lesson. D. It's ineffable. (Pick any combination you like. Answers may vary according to how well the person explaining knows the people suffering.) How do Christians reconcile suffering in their own lives? They tend to take it more personally than they do when it's happening to someone else. Otherwise, it's about the same.

15. Ive met lots of people who say they are Christian but havent been to church in a long time. Ive even met some who say they were raised Christian but never went to church. Can you be Christian outside of a community of Christians? Yes, but other Christians will probably mistake you for some sort of heretic.


OMG It's December!


OMG It's December!


Yesterday I finished NaNoWriMo. A month of hard writing and a nearly complete novel later and Sue is a happy author. This is the first time I've finished NaNo.




I sip my Gin Tonic, take a deep breath and think OMG. Now you'd think I'd be worrying about Christmas. After all, there is only 25 days to go, but no, I'm panicking about editing a story, putting together a blog tour, finishing my story because there's a deadline, and keeping ukgayromancegoing.

I think I'm going to be one of those boring mothers that buys everything online in one frantic evening. I only buy for my kids so all is okay. As they've got older it has got easier. They prefer the cash to the presents.
What are you doing this December? Are you prepared for Christmas?~~Sue Brown is owned by her dogs and two children. When she isn't following their orders, she can be found plotting at her laptop. In fact she hides so she can plot, and is now an expert at ignoring the orders.Sue discovered M/M erotica at the time she woke up to find two men kissing on her favourite television series. The series was boring; the kissing was not. She may be late to the party, but she's made up for it since, writing fan fiction until she was brave enough to venture out into the world of original fiction.Sue can be found at her website, http://www.suebrownstories.com/; her blog, http://suebrownsstories.blogspot.co.uk/; Twitter, https://twitter.com/suebrownstories; and her Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/suebrownstories.





LEJ Designs Challenge 81 - Buttons Bows or Beads


LEJ Designs Challenge 81 - Buttons Bows or Beads

Good Morning PeepsThanks to everyone for entering last weeks challenge - Alter it or GiftsAll the entries were brilliant!Before we go on to this weeks challenge, lets give congrats to the last challenge winners.Here are the lucky randomly chosen winners of the challengeWinner of 4 Digi's from LEJ Designs is markAnd the winner of the craft goodies iselllapu


Please take our Winners badge for your blogsand email Lindsay on sales@lejdesigns.co.uk to claim your prizes Our Star Crafters for this week are,
Elaine
Gail Scott(#2)
CraftyGirl

Please take our star crafters badge for your blogThis weeks Challenge Theme is....Button Bows Or BeadsHere's the prize infoThe first randomly drawn winner will receive four Digis of their choice from
LEJ Designs

The second randomly drawn name will win some crafty goodiesHere's some inspiration from the DT

Lindsay Artist/Owner

Kathryn DT Leader




Lisa DT Organiser



Catherine
Janet

Pam
Remember you can enter a maximum of 3 projects per challenge, you may combine with as many other challenges as you like but no back linking please And peeps please don't forget you must add an active link to our challenge blog in your post and your creations must fit the theme to be entered in to the prize drawDon't forget if you use an LEJ designs image you get entered in to an extra prize draw.PLEASE PUT 'LEJ' AFTER YOUR NAME SO THE TEAM KNOWS YOU HAVE USED ONEThe jackpot is4 digi's this week Please do have a browse over at LEJ designs as new images are added frequently Don't forget to keep your eyes open for freebies Love from LEJ Teamiesdocument.write('');

Hayek was originally a Liquidationist Free Bankers are Wrong!


Hayek was originally a Liquidationist Free Bankers are Wrong!


Paul Krugman recently pointed out that Milton Friedman rejected Hayeks liquidationism, and points to a clear passage in Prices and Production demonstrating Hayeks liquidationist views.

The free banker Larry White then complains that this is untrue, and that Hayek has been “mischaracterized” as a liquidationist, when he was a stable-MV man.

Daniel Kuehn then weighs in here and here.

Quite simply, White is conflating two different views Hayek held at different points in his life, and ignores the fact that Hayek did indeed originally advocate liquidationism at the time of Prices and Production in the early 1930s.

Moreover, Whites paper “Did Hayek and Robbins Deepen the Great Depression?” (White 2008) demonstrates that Hayeks thought was not a significant influence on US Federal Reserve policy makers under Hoover, but not that Hayek in 1931 or 1932 was advocating monetary expansion to stabilise nominal spending. The only evidence adduced for the idea that Hayek wanted to stabilise money supply when velocity varied in a recession comes from Hayeks works published years after 1931 at a time when it is clear that Hayek had changed his mind (such as in Hayek 1937 and Hayek 1933). White (2008: 763) even states that Hayek and Robbins “failed to call for central banks to do what they could to counter the sharp monetary contraction and crushing deflation during 1930–33.”

The reality of Hayeks policy ideas is this: at some point after 1933 Hayek changed his mind and renounced hard liquidationism.

Certainly by the time of his 1937 essay “The Gold Problem” (“Das Goldproblem”; see Hayek 1999: 169–185, and 184), Hayek is found actually endorsing, not just MV stability, but deficit financed public works as a response to depression:“Even though there are many concerns about organizing public works ad hoc during a depression, everything speaks in favour of having public agencies perform during a depression whatever investment activities need to be carried out in any case and can possibly be postposed until then. It is the timing of these expenses that presents a problem, since funds are often extremely hard to raise in the midst of a severe depression and the accumulation of reserves in good times generally faces the objections mentioned above. There is little question that in times of general unemployment the state must intervene to mitigate genuine hardship either by disbursing unemployment compensation or, as in earlier times, by legislation to help the poor. (Hayek 1999 [1937]: 184; see also Hayek 1978: 210–212).Now Ludwig Lachmann, who was Hayeks research assistant at the LSE in the 1930s, in an Austrian Economics Newsletter (AEN) interview explains the change in Hayeks thinking:“AEN: In the early 30s there had been great interest among the profession in the Austrian or Hayekian theory of the trade cycle. Yet as the 1930s progressed even those who had been adherents seemed to have given up their belief in its correctness. What reasons do you think were behind this?

Lachmann: Well, you presumably know about the two different letters to the London Times that appeared in October, 1932. This, of course, was before I came to London. In one of them, Keynes and some Cambridge economists who were not, in general, his friends, like Pigou and Dennis Robertson, demanded that the government should take steps against unemployment. And three days later, Hayek, Robbins and Arnold Plant sent another letter saying that anything the government did by way of public works or similar methods would only make things worse and would not have the affect that Keynes claimed it would have.

That is to say, the Austrians seemed to be committed to a policy of continuous deflation whatever happened. Yes, Im quite sure that the apparent insistence of the Austrians that the depression must run its course in the sense that both prices and wages in general must fall seemed to make it increasingly difficult for most other economists to support it, because it was by then obvious that wages didnt fall, not in the Britain of the 1930s anyway. That is to say, there was an obvious difference between the point of view expressed by Hayek, Robbins and their letter of October, 1932, and their willingness to admit the following year that a secondary depression was possible.”
Ludwig Lachmann, “An Interview with Ludwig Lachmann,” The Austrian Economics Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 3 (Fall 1978), Mises.org.Lachmann was quite clear here that the Austrian view of Hayek in 1932 was that the “depression must run its course.”

As I noted above, Lachmann was in a position to know Hayeks opinions, as he was at the London School of Economics (LSE) as research assistant to Hayek in the 1930s, and then conducted work for Hayek on the issue of “secondary depressions.”

Hayeks recantation was, as Lachmann says, related to his admission of the existence of “secondary depressions” or what he later called “secondary deflations.”

Curiously, the letter which Hayek signed with Lionel Robbins and others, printed in the Times (October 19, 1932) and which can be read here, although it rejects government spending, has this qualification: “(1) On the first issue – whether to use ones money or whether to hoard it – there is no important difference between us. It is agreed that hoarding money, whether in cash or in idle balances, is deflationary in its effects. No one thinks that deflation is in itself desirable.”If one reads the full letter, one can see how there was a fundamental contradiction between (1) the recognition that deflation in itself was not desirable and (2) the policy proposal of doing nothing of any substance (apart from capital account liberalisation and the absurd idea of more free trade, as if export-led growth would have cured the depression) in an economy hit by deflationary forces in 1932.

There is also a second issue: this was a letter signed by a number of other economists, and reflects the groups view that they wished to see expressed in public. Hayeks personal views might have been different. In fact, Hayek tells us explicitly that he did see deflation as desirable, not for its own sake, but for the sake of breaking the downward rigidity of wages:“… a secondary depression caused by an induced deflation should of course be prevented by appropriate monetary counter-measures. Though I am sometimes accused of having represented the deflationary cause of the business cycles as part of the curative process, I do not think that was ever what I argued. What I did believe at one time was that a deflation might be necessary to break the developing downward rigidity of all particular wages which has of course become one of the main causes of inflation. I no longer think this is a politically possible method and we shall have to find other means to restore the flexibility of the wage structure than the present method of raising all wages except those which must fall relatively to all others. Nor did I ever doubt that in most situations employment could be temporarily increased by increasing money expenditure.” (Hayek 1978: 210–211).Hayek also indicated that he held a different view on the role of deflation during the depression from his later years:“Although I do not regard deflation as the original cause of a decline in business activity, such a reaction has unquestionably the tendency to induce a process of deflation – to cause what more than 40 years ago I called a secondary deflation – the effect of which may be worse, and in the 1930s certainly was worse, than what the original cause of the reaction made necessary, and which has no steering function to perform. I must confess that forty years ago I argued differently. I have since altered my opinion – not about the theoretical explanation of the events, but about the practical possibility of removing the obstacles to the functioning of the system in a particular way” (Hayek 1978: 206).Hayeks reputation for liquidationism was the result of his lectures at the LSE and his writings in Prices and Production (1st edn.; London, 1931), which must reflect his lectures.

In particular, as Krugman himself noted, from passages like this in Prices and Production:“If the foregoing analysis is correct, it should be fairly clear that the granting of credit to consumers, which has recently been so strongly advocated as a cure for depression, would in fact have quite the contrary effect; a relative increase of the demand for consumers goods could only make matters worse. Matters are not quite so simple so far as the effects of credits granted for productive purposes are concerned. In theory it is at least possible that, during the acute stage of the crisis when the capitalistic structure of production tends to shrink more than will ultimately prove necessary, an expansion of producers credits might have a wholesome effect. But this could only be the case if the quantity were so regulated as exactly to compensate for the initial, excessive rise of the relative prices of consumers goods, and if arrangements could be made to withdraw the additional credits as these prices fall and the proportion between the supply of consumers goods and the supply of intermediate products adapts itself to the proportion between the demand for these goods. And even these credits would do more harm than good if they made roundabout processes seem profitable which, even after the acute crisis had subsided, could not be kept up without the help of additional credits. Frankly, I do not see how the banks can ever be in a position to keep credit within these limits.

And, if we pass from the moment of actual crisis to the situation in the following depression, it is still more difficult to see what lasting good effects can come from credit expansion. The thing which is needed to secure healthy conditions is the most speedy and complete adaptation possible of the structure of production to the proportion between the demand for consumers goods and the demand for producers goods as determined by voluntary saving and spending. If the proportion as determined by the voluntary decisions of individuals is distorted by the creation of artificial demand, it must mean that part of the available resources is again led into a wrong direction and a definite and lasting adjustment is again postponed. And, even if the absorption of the unemployed resources were to be quickened in this way, it would only mean that the seed would already be sown for new disturbances and new crises. The only way permanently to “mobilize” all available resources is, therefore, not to use artificial stimulants—whether during a crisis or thereafter—but to leave it to time to effect a permanent cure by the slow process of adapting the structure of production to the means available for capital purposes.

(10) And so, at the end of our analysis, we arrive at results which only confirm the old truth that we may perhaps prevent a crisis by checking expansion in time, but that we can do nothing to get out of it before its natural end, once it has come.” (Hayek 2008: 274–275). What could be clearer than this?

Note that I have actually quoted the second edition of Prices and Production (1935) here, and it is telling that as late as 1935, the date of this second edition, Hayek was still saying that “we can do nothing to get out of ... [sc. a recession] before its natural end.”

There is an important issue open for debate: where are these alleged passages in the first edition of Prices and Production (1931) that supposedly show Hayek wanting to stabilize MV during depressions by monetary policy?


Appendix: Note on the Editions of Prices and Production
The first edition was Prices and Production. G. Routledge & Sons, London, 1931. This was 112 pages long.

The second edition was Prices and Production (2nd rev. and enl. edn.). G. Routledge, London, 1935. This was 162 pages long. So it is clear that the second edition was considerably expanded and larger than the first.

Links
Paul Krugman, “Friedman and the Austrians,” August 11, 2013.

Larry White, “Krugman on Friedman, Hayek, and Liquidationism,” Free Banking, August 12th, 2013.

Daniel Kuehn, “Hayek said Liquidationist Things and he said Stable Nominal Income Things and the Latter Doesnt Erase the Former,” Facts and Other Stubborn Things, August 13, 2013.

“Hayek on Monetary Stabilisation in a Secondary Deflation,” August 6, 2011.

“Did Hayek Advocate Public Works in a Depression?,” September 25, 2011.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Hayek, F. A. von. 1931. Prices and Production (1st edn.). G. Routledge & Sons, London.

Hayek, F. A. von. 1975 [1933]. “Savings,” in F. A. von Hayek, Profits, Interest and Investment. Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, Clifton, NJ. 157–170.

Hayek, F. A. von. 1935. Prices and Production (2nd rev. and enl. edn.). G. Routledge, London. reprinted in Hayek 2008.]

Hayek, F. A. von. 1937. Monetary Nationalism and International Stability. Longmans, Green, London.

Hayek, F. A. von. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Hayek, F. A. von. 1999. “The Gold Problem” (trans. G. Heinz), in S. Kresge (ed.), The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. Volume 5. Good Money, Part 1. The New World. Routledge, London. 169–185.

Hayek, F. A. von, 2008. Prices and Production and Other Works: F. A. Hayek on Money, the Business Cycle, and the Gold Standard. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.

White, Lawrence H. 2008. “Did Hayek and Robbins Deepen the Great Depression?,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40.4: 751–768.



Despite the fact that the White House sits on federal land, it does not appear that the Obama family will be evicted during the supposed shutdown. Regular Americans who pay the government


\Despite the fact that the White House sits on federal land, it does not appear that the Obama family will be evicted during the supposed shutdown. Regular Americans who pay the government


Congress to Probe Govt. Attacks on Homeowners, Businesses During Shutdown

Written by Alex Newman

As outrage and defiance against the Obama administrations “shutdown” antics continue to escalate, lawmakers in Congress plan to investigate growing numbers of reports on the eviction of homeowners and the shuttering of businesses that sit on public lands. The uproar comes in the wake of media accounts and comments from public servants suggesting that the executive branch is trying to make the bogus “shutdown” — most of the federal government is still up and running — feel as painful as possible in an effort to extort taxpayer money to fund ObamaCare.

All across the country, business owners and residents on “federal property” — in other words, land that taxpayers are supposed own — are reportedly being ordered by armed bureaucrats to get out until the supposed “shutdown” ends. From elderly homeowners near Lake Mead to businesses in North Carolina that do not cost taxpayers anything, the number of victims of the administrations lawless efforts to make Americans submit to ObamaCare continues to grow. Citizens and their representatives, though, have had just about enough.

In Congress, Republicans expressed outrage. “Many of these non-federally funded sites exist throughout the United States and operate with no staff or resources from the National Park Service,” said a statement issued by GOP lawmakers on the House Natural Resources Committee, who plan to investigate. “This is yet another example of the Obama administration attempting to make the government shutdown as painful as possible and forcing closures of private and nonprofit operators that did not happen during previous government shutdowns.”

Spokesperson Mallory Micetich for Republicans on the committee confirmed to Fox News that lawmakers planned to investigate the schemes as part of a “widening probe into the National Park Services response to the partial government suspension.” According to Micetich, the committee is receiving “a lot of reports” about businesses being shut down, too, citing as one example a privately run inn along the Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina.

In a letter sent last week to National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis, who has been accused even by his own staff of trying to make the pseudo-shutdown “as difficult for people as we can,” committee leaders said the agency should keep all correspondence surrounding decisions about what to close down. The committee plans to investigate, among other issues, “the staff time and costs associated with the transport, erection, and maintenance of the barriers ... [and] the staff time and costs associated with patrolling and securing these sites prior to and during their closure.”

Separately, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is also demanding answers about the administrations shenanigans. In a letter to the National Parks Service from Committee Chair Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Government Operations Subcommittee Chair John Mica (R, Fla.), the senior Republicans demanded to know by October 17 why the open-air World War II memorial (shown) and other monuments were needlessly barricaded during the partial shutdown — apparently at an additional cost to taxpayers.

“The Committee is concerned with NPSs allocation of resources during this time of lapsed funding. Our concerns are heightened due to NPSs suspicious decisions during the lead-up to the sequester,” the lawmakers explained. “This past spring the Committee uncovered evidence that NPSs budgetary decisions were designed to intentionally cause the most disruption to the public in a time of reduced funding.... Specifically, the Committee received information that proposed budget adjustments submitted by an NPS official in the field to deal with sequestration impacts were rejected by NPS superiors in favor of cuts that would be more visible and disruptive.”

Many of the people and businesses targeted by the Obama administrations shutdown antics have submitted, leaving their houses or shuttering their businesses after being ordered to do so under threat of arrest. One of the stories that has attracted the most attention thus far involves an elderly couple — 77-year-old Joyce Spencer and her husband Ralph, 80 — who own a lake-side cabin near Las Vegas.

Despite owning the home since the 1970s, federal agents ordered them to leave. “Unfortunately overnight stays are not permitted until a budget is passed and the park can reopen,” park officials told KTNV in a statement. The couple is spending most of their time at the family ice cream store and with relatives until they can return, according to media reports.

“I had to go to town today and buy Ralph undershirts and jeans because I forgot his pants,” Joyce Spencer told the local media outlet in comments that have since become national news, adding that it was a lot to handle for a senior citizen. “I had to be sure and get his walker and his scooter that he has to go in…. We're not hurt in any way except it might cost me if I have to go buy more pants.” The Spencers also said the house was their property and they should be allowed in regardless of whether or not there is a “shutdown.”

Another local resident noted that they were not ordered to leave during the last shutdown, confirming once again that the administration is going out of its way — and squandering additional taxpayer resources — to make Americans suffer for demanding that their representatives in Congress refuse to fund the federal healthcare takeover. In all, some 60 families were reportedly kicked out of their houses.

However, as bureaucrats keep pushing, some Americans are starting to fight back, too. ABC News, for example, labeled them “shut-down rebels.” Inspired by the World War II veterans who recently defied the administrations effort to shut down their open-air memorial — they simply moved the barricades, or “Barrycades,” as they are being called to ridicule Obamas antics. Increasing numbers of citizens are just saying “no” to the bullying and extortion tactics aimed at extracting taxpayer funds for ObamaCare.

In North Carolina, park officials ordered Bruce O'Connell to shut down his inn and restaurant because they sit on taxpayer-owned land, making many of his employees jobless and homeless at the same time. At first, O'Connell complied with the orders. But then, outraged, he changed his mind and decided to open up for business in defiance of the administrations decrees.

“I've witnessed first-hand the process getting more and more dysfunctional over the decades,” he told ABC, adding that his business would have paid $30,000 to the federal government for October — if it had been allowed to remain open. “I'd just reached my breaking point…. If not now, when; and if not me, who?”

Federal bureaucrats, though, were not pleased with the defiance. So, they sent a swarm of armed functionaries to terrorize O'Connell and his elderly mother into submission. Over the weekend, exasperated, there was nothing left for the productive business owners to do but comply with the demands. However, in another act of defiance, O'Connell posted a message on Facebook letting people know what was going on and blasting the machinations.

“We have ceased operations. I am furious all over again,” O'Connell wrote. “Rangers are guarding our parking lot 24/7 keeping visitors out. It is downright scary. What the heck is going on and how are we all allowing it? I call for action now. Enough is enough.” Supporters from around the world are sending e-mails urging him to “fight tyranny,” he told ABC.

Meanwhile, in Philadelphia, City Tavern, which opened in 1773 and once served Americas Founding Fathers, has also been ordered shut by authorities because it is inside the Independence National Historical Park. Booked parties were cancelled, the restaurant could end up losing huge sums of money, and employees may even have to look for other work, according to news reports.

The situation is similar in Virginia, where federal bureaucrats forced the non-profit Claude Moore Colonial Farm to shut down — despite the fact that it has paid its own way without taxpayer funds for more than three decades. “We have had to cancel every event at the Farm this week so we have already lost more than $15,000 in operating income because October is the busiest month of the year for us,” said Anna Eberly, the managing director, adding that while the government may be funded by everyone, the non-profit may have to close down if the costly federal antics continue.

“The Farm may never reopen again if we cannot open soon because we don't have any other source of revenue except that which we earn for ourselves,” Eberly explained. “The staff has been here all week in spite of being threatened with arrest because we feel our cause is just and the Farm is worth protecting. And many of our volunteers are Federal employees that now have time on their hands. They could be here volunteering but are banned from the Farm. What an incredibly stupid waste of time and talent.”

According to figures cited by the Daily Caller, the Obama administrations ham-handed decision to deploy federal agents to block off private businesses is costing the tourism industry more than $75 million per day. Homeowners on federal land are being hit hard, too. Despite the fact that the White House sits on federal land, it does not appear that the Obama family will be evicted during the supposed shutdown. Regular Americans who pay the governments bills, however, apparently must be made to suffer until their representatives submit to the presidents demand to fund ObamaCare.

Link:
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/16702-congress-probes-obama-shutdown-attacks-on-home-owners-businesses




Bannock (Idaho) City Trader Absconds with Money, Provisions Shipped


Bannock (Idaho) City Trader Absconds with Money, Provisions Shipped



On October 8, 1863, The Oregonian reported details on the census of Idaho Territory. (Those details were known and used earlier – after September 21 – by Governor Wallace in Lewiston, to establish legislative and judicial districts.)

The article then gave news from Bannock City: “Our mercantile community were a little startled a few days ago at the sudden disappearance of a Mr. Hoyt, formerly of Olympia. He has been a successful trader – his profits in less than two months, have amounted to about $10,000.”

The trader had, the article went on, “managed to buy goods of different parties on credit. He owed one concern between three and four thousand dollars.”

The surprise at his disappearance was not, however, occasioned by the usual fear of foul play: “He had the money with him, but couldnt well spare it. When last heard of, he was traveling, as fast as possible, towards Salt Lake. A purse of $1,000 was made up by his constituents, and an express started after him, to invite him to return.”

Having disposed of that matter, the report went on, “We have positive information, by the Salt Lake Express, that there is any quantity of eggs, butter, bacon, salt and flour on the way here from Salt Lake.”

This item, of course, represented the other side of earlier complaints from Salt Lake about how the gold camps were draining provisions out of Utah. Miners naturally hoped that greater supplies might drive costs down to more reasonable levels.


362, in which a country is traversed


362, in which a country is traversed


After a couple of months of looking, I was lucky enough to land a few job interviews about a month ago, and wouldn't you know it, the first one came through. I would have probably accepted just about any company that would have had me, but it happened that this one was a particularly nice fit. (They're also fairly well known in Japan, as it turns out. I told Tamsen's parents' Japanese exchange student where I was working, and his eyes just about bugged out of his head.) We were hoping I could get a job not too long after graduating so that Edith could have health insurance, and everything worked out very nicely on that front.

The trick, however, was that we were living in Eugene, and the job was just outside of Nashville. So we needed to pack our things and get to Tennessee within two weeks.

The packing and moving, though unpleasant, wasn't actually so bad. The getting to Tennessee was much more interesting though, and that's the story I'm going to tell here.

Devotees will know that I like to make use of my Twitter feed, and driving from Oregon to Tennessee seemed like a pretty good chance to do just that. I looked at the map, found that I'd have to go through ten states to get to Nashville, and decided to use the hashtag #TenToTenn for my three-day trip. You know, because jokes. I had a route all planned out, a Twitter hashtag ready to go, and was actually looking forward to the trip a little bit.

Once I got on the road, though, I realized that maybe it wasn't going to be quite the fun road trip I imagined. A quick look at the map and you'll see what I mean.


The picture might be a little small, but you can clearly see both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans on that map. This might be less of a trip and more of an odyssey.The first day wasn't so bad, as it was a drive I'd made several times before. I left Portland early Wednesday morning and planned on making it to Salt Lake that evening.
A long drive, to be sure, and one that would take me through lots of desert and mountains, but not too bad. My only concern was making it across the Blue Mountains in eastern Oregon. It's a chain-up zone in the winter because of snow storms, and I didn't have any snow chains. The weather forecast said it was going to be clear, though, so I forged ahead.My first stop was in The Dalles, OR, where I stopped to fill up and realized that The Dalles is the second to last stop in the much-beloved Oregon Trail video game. Which led me to the following realization:First stop: The Dalles. It strikes me that this trip is basically the Oregon Trail in reverse. #TenToTenn
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 6, 2013
As it turned out, that tweet was by far the most popular of my whole trip. Friends spent much of the day making all of the Oregon Trail jokes I wanted to but couldn't, ranging from shooting buffaloes but not being able to fit all the meat in my car to making sure I caulked the car properly before trying to float across a river. I didn't end up seeing the jokes until I arrived in Salt Lake that evening.When I got to the Idaho border, I decided to take a picture, something I tried to do with every border crossing I made.

A sad picture for me, but perhaps not as sad as the one that followed.
Oh, Idaho. Why do you have to be so Idaho?Idaho wasn't actually as bad as eastern Oregon. Idaho was shorter to get through, and there were a fair amount of large cities to use as landmarks to gauge my progress. Eastern Oregon just has a lot of empty space. (And Hermiston and La Grande, in case residents of those cities are reading this.) I made it to Utah just as it was getting dark. I took a picture of the "Welcome to Utah" sign, but I guess I didn't save it to my phone properly, so you'll just have to imagine it. The darkness made it tricky to see, anyway.I stayed at my aunt's house, and my sister and her boyfriend came to visit, as did Eliza. It was nice to see everyone, but I don't think I was very good company, since I was so tired. They were all too well-mannered to say otherwise, though, which was nice.The next morning, I got up early and headed east through the mountains to Wyoming. The goal was Lincoln, NE.
This day promised to be the least exciting of my trip, as the directions consisted more or less of "get on I-80 East, then get off when you get to Lincoln." I was lucky enough to get NPR stations through nearly all of my first day, but not so much so on my second day. The silver lining, though, was that I got to listen to my ABBA greatest hits CD through most of Wyoming. When I got to Cheyenne and stopped for lunch, I told everyone just how much I was enjoying the CD.Feel the beat from the tambourIIIIIIIINE OH YEEEAAAH (this is what it would have been like to ride with me) #TenToTenn
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 7, 2013
Energized with the power of Swedish disco, I got through Wyoming and saw this just after lunch:
Wyoming was very hilly, if somewhat uninteresting to look it (except for some snow-covered valleys, which were spectacular under that huge blue sky); the instant I crossed the border into Nebraska, though, it got flat. And it stayed flat, all the way to Lincoln. Nebraska was not an especially exciting state. But I had a cheap motel room to look forward to, and I was planning on watching the Oregon-Stanford game as a reward for making it all that way. (And of course, Oregon lost and lost badly. So much for my reward.)I got up early the next morning and prepared to drive.Day 3. You ready? Because I'm ready. I mean, I want to die. But I'm ready. #TenToTenn
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 8, 2013
This was an interesting day for me, as I was going through six states, very little of which I'd been to before. Here's the route I took.
You might notice that this route would take me through Iowa, but only for about ten miles. It was over nearly as soon as it began, but that didn't mean I was going to miss an opportunity to take my "Welcome to Iowa" picture.
Nice, huh? I took this one about five minutes later.
Missouri was a nice city. I drove through Kansas City, which I'd never seen before, and I spent most of it looking for Arrowhead Stadium. I didn't end up seeing it, but I was bowled over by the sight of Royals Stadium and the gigantic crown in the outfield. It was pretty impressive. I made my way across the state to St. Louis, and at this point, cabin fever really started to set in. I'd been driving for about 30 hours, and I was starting to feel like I was getting close to my destination. I wasn't, of course; I still had three more states to get through, but that didn't stop me from getting restless.SEE THAT GIIIIRL, WATCH THAT SCEEEENE, DIGGIN' THE DANCING QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN #TenToTenn
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 8, 2013
Kansas City, incidentally, is the starting point of the Oregon Trail game (Independence, technically, but it's a suburb), and as I passed through, I realized that I'd basically just played the game in reverse over the last two and a half days.It took me less than three days to undo months of the pioneers' work. #TenToTenn
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 8, 2013
Onward to Illinois. I wasn't going to be in the state for more than a couple of hours, so I figured I needed to take advantage of the chance to listen to Sufjan Stevens' Illinoiswhile driving through the state it's named for. I did, and it was lovely. The woods of southern Illinois are beautiful, and I found myself wishing just a little that I could have landed a job there so I could have spent more time in that country.Alas, for what could have been. I drove down into Kentucky. I would have taken the "welcome to Kentucky" picture, but not only was it dark when I got there, the sign is at the end of a bridge, so I couldn't pull over and get the picture. (That's what I did for all of the pictures I took while driving; I think it's a really bad idea to use a phone while one is driving and I made a point of avoiding it on my trip.)I didn't miss this sign, though, despite the darkness:Welcome to Tennessee. #TenToTenn pic.twitter.com/oFicXADoRG
— Sam Orme (@TheRealSamOrme) November 9, 2013The darkness makes it a little tricky to see, but that's the sign that was welcoming me to my new home. Hooray! I mean, I guess; I still didn't know anyone in Tennessee, nor had I even seen my new house.And that's my trip. It might sound like I'm leaving things out, because surely more happened over the course of 36 hours of driving, but really, I'm basically omitting stories of eating burgers in the car, scanning the dial for the next NPR affiliate, and singing along to ABBA at the very top of my lungs. It was long, it was boring despite the new terrain, and I'm very happy to be reunited with my family again.